(no subject)
Feb. 13th, 2011 11:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
gwydion* I am in love with the blue Willow Tea Tibicina bought me. Omnomnom.
* Valentine cake: http://cakewrecks.blogspot.com/2011/02/sunday-sweets-heart-attack.html
* Snerk: http://q13-exe.livejournal.com/425143.html
* Sparkindarkness on how the Civil Union Law in England discriminates against religions that have no problem with marriage equality. I've been on about this sort of thing over here for years: http://sparkindarkness.livejournal.com/382822.html?style=mine
* There is a studied looking for respondents who are partners of trans men and partnered trans men. If you would like to get more information or to participate in this research study, please email Rebecca at rlkeo929@gmail.com with the subject line: Partner of FTM Research.
There's very little research on trans men just generally so any little bit helps.
* There's also a friendship study looking for any trans folk, binary or non-binary to take an online survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/transgenderexperiences
* Apparently the Republican anti-choice bill also restricts the drug they use to help remove what's left after a miscarriage, presumably because Christians are in favour of letting women die needlessly of infections instead of removing something that's already dead. Can we please stop trying to replace secular law with religious law now? Why are Republicans so intent on killing innocent women over made up religious principals that are only a little over a hundred years old and not even in their Bible. If I decide tomorrow that my religion requires anyone who doesn't wear purple on Thursdays to be executed, would it be reasonable to write that into law and enforce it? The House Republicans are deciding that they want to kill real live women because they had a miscarriage. Why is this even an item up for debate? Why is an already dead fetus more important than an actual live woman?
* The Clutch:
* Valentine cake: http://cakewrecks.blogspot.com/2011/02/sunday-sweets-heart-attack.html
* Snerk: http://q13-exe.livejournal.com/425143.html
* Sparkindarkness on how the Civil Union Law in England discriminates against religions that have no problem with marriage equality. I've been on about this sort of thing over here for years: http://sparkindarkness.livejournal.com/382822.html?style=mine
* There is a studied looking for respondents who are partners of trans men and partnered trans men. If you would like to get more information or to participate in this research study, please email Rebecca at rlkeo929@gmail.com with the subject line: Partner of FTM Research.
There's very little research on trans men just generally so any little bit helps.
* There's also a friendship study looking for any trans folk, binary or non-binary to take an online survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/transgenderexperiences
* Apparently the Republican anti-choice bill also restricts the drug they use to help remove what's left after a miscarriage, presumably because Christians are in favour of letting women die needlessly of infections instead of removing something that's already dead. Can we please stop trying to replace secular law with religious law now? Why are Republicans so intent on killing innocent women over made up religious principals that are only a little over a hundred years old and not even in their Bible. If I decide tomorrow that my religion requires anyone who doesn't wear purple on Thursdays to be executed, would it be reasonable to write that into law and enforce it? The House Republicans are deciding that they want to kill real live women because they had a miscarriage. Why is this even an item up for debate? Why is an already dead fetus more important than an actual live woman?
* The Clutch: